[DEECo] [d3scomp/JDEECo] b220b0: Figured out how to correctly register the model pa...
GitHub
noreply at github.com
Fri Feb 5 18:08:22 CET 2016
Branch: refs/heads/IntelligentEnsembles
Home: https://github.com/d3scomp/JDEECo
Commit: b220b021b78281ca3b41177816ae35445409b969
https://github.com/d3scomp/JDEECo/commit/b220b021b78281ca3b41177816ae35445409b969
Author: Buckey <aertheas at gmail.com>
Date: 2016-02-05 (Fri, 05 Feb 2016)
Changed paths:
M jdeeco-edl-model/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
M jdeeco-edl-tests/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
A jdeeco-edl-tests/src/cz/cuni/mff/d3s/jdeeco/edl/EDLDemo.java
A jdeeco-edl-tests/test.edl
M jdeeco-edl/src/cz/cuni/mff/d3s/jdeeco/edl/GenerateEDL.mwe2
R jdeeco-edl/test.edl
Log Message:
-----------
Figured out how to correctly register the model package with the GenerateEDL workflow. Moved test.edl to jdeeco-edl-tests, added EDLDemo showing how to load a DOM from an EDL file. Note that the demo can't be placed in the core EDL project, as the dependency on the Guice API results in a bundle conflict and nasty errors when using the UI plugin.
Commit: e537f27e92ef89a702e6dd6507d71c3b74e30c9a
https://github.com/d3scomp/JDEECo/commit/e537f27e92ef89a702e6dd6507d71c3b74e30c9a
Author: Buckey <aertheas at gmail.com>
Date: 2016-02-05 (Fri, 05 Feb 2016)
Changed paths:
M jdeeco-edl/src/cz/cuni/mff/d3s/jdeeco/edl/EDL.xtext
Log Message:
-----------
Major rewrite of all Query rules, hopefully allowing for left-associative infix notation that should be familiar to users from standard programming languages.
Commit: 0fcc7d7a8f8c457e35baa94257ef554c9cb429a6
https://github.com/d3scomp/JDEECo/commit/0fcc7d7a8f8c457e35baa94257ef554c9cb429a6
Author: Buckey <aertheas at gmail.com>
Date: 2016-02-05 (Fri, 05 Feb 2016)
Changed paths:
A jdeeco-edl-model/.gitignore
A jdeeco-edl-tests/.gitignore
A jdeeco-edl-ui/.gitignore
A jdeeco-edl/.gitignore
Log Message:
-----------
Added .gitignore files to all EDL projects, leading to Git ignoring most of the code that can be regenerated. Model project also currently ignores all Java model classes, if implementation of some operations is added in the future, the ignore filter will need to be changed.
Compare: https://github.com/d3scomp/JDEECo/compare/628cba687176...0fcc7d7a8f8c
More information about the DEECo
mailing list