[NSWI004] a04 - Semaphore wait/trywait inconsistency
Martin Zimen
zimenm at seznam.cz
Sat Nov 28 20:49:25 CET 2020
Hello,
I'd like to ask about behavior of sem_wait and sem_trywait. In description
of sem_wait
> Decrement the value of this semaphore. If the new value would be negative,
> block and wait for someone to call sem_post() first.
Therefore it would block iff the initial value was less or equal to 0.
However in sem_trywait
> @retval EBUSY Semaphore has value of 0 and locking would block.
Why shouldn't I return EBUSY when value is negative?
Is there a reason I miss for which these two function behave differently?
Thank you
Martin Zimen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://d3s.mff.cuni.cz/pipermail/nswi004/attachments/20201128/dec1b82f/attachment.htm>
More information about the NSWI004
mailing list